London Small Girl Sex
Download ===== https://urluss.com/2tdq2F
Among the most damning evidence in the Jay report was that a month before the report was compiled, Rotherham council had concluded that abuse figures from 2004 to 2005 did not suggest the previous year's figure of 2,410 victims in Rotherham was inaccurate. That change was made despite the fact that the response rate to crime victimisation surveys suggested the annual victimisation rate had actually increased. Press reports of the case against the gang also included details of a girl's statement that the Jay report said was "among the more sensitive and distressing" material in the report. She and her mother had been provided with drugs and told they would be given a new house if they had sex with a number of men. The mother had agreed to become an informant, and the girl had been raped a number of times, but when she had told her mother she wanted to stop, apparently the gang had threatened to kill her. Her mother had refused to help her, but had told her that she would be safe if she went anywhere a gang member took her. Accordingly, the girl had a restraining order to protect her from being kidnapped and raped. She had spoken to her father, in Pakistan, had told him she was being abused, and he had vowed to kill the people involved when he returned, according to press reports. The girl had not been asked to name her abusers, and Weir did not include data to enable her to do so.
The Jay report highlighted that when the police had previously obtained evidence against the gang, it had been suppressed because the offences were said to be too "sensitive".[102] At a press briefing on its findings in 2007, the police commissioner at the time, Sir Norman Scott, rejected accusations that it had been the police that had tried to cover up the earlier rapes at the hands of a gang of Pakistani men. The latter were, he said, the only confirmed rapes in the Rotherham area for which alleged victims had given reported to the police. d2c66b5586